Kafka on the Shore is
the second book I've read by Haruki Murakami. The Wind Up
Bird Chronicle was the first,
which I read at the end of May. Normally I space my reading of
specific authors out more, even when they are good. I realize that
two novels into a career's worth of work technically means I am a
novice when assessing the larger significance they might hold in the
world of literature – but
damn if I don't think I've found the genuine article here, a master
of letters. I see a lot of people try and put a finger on Murakami's
particular brand of genius by inserting the names of two to four of
their favorites and then adding some off color comment about how they
fit together. A common example mentions something like 'having a
baby' or 'throwing a party' or 'cramming in a clown car, speeding
down the freeway high on mushrooms'. You'll get none of that from me
; though honestly it isn't because I'm altogether against that kind
of mash up comparison. I just really wouldn't know how to put it.
Murakami is just too uniquely Murakami for me to smartly simplify
things for you.
One
of the things that struck me during, and after reading this book was
just how interesting I found the characters. This is an impressive
feat considering the cast presented. Kafka, the main protagonist
starts out a runaway whose determined to be the toughest 15 year old
kid in the world. Kafka is running away from a prophecy, and a fate
out of Greek tragedy. This quest alone may have been enough to carry
a very good story – but this was better than very good. As such
Murakami introduces us to Nakata, an old man who suffered a
mysterious accident in his youth and has subsequently lost the
ability to read and write, forcing him to live on what he calls his
sub city from the
government. However cruel this may seem the accident has somehow left
Nakata with the ability to speak with cats. He uses this ability to
earn a little money on the side as a cat-finder in his neighborhood.
Once the story gets rolling chapters alternate between these primary
points of view. Even this doesn't really express the depth of
intrigue that Murakami's characters provide. Everyone in this book is
interesting and in some way memorable : from the hemophiliac
assistant librarian who likes to listen to classical music while
speeding in his sportcar, and his generous yet secretive boss who
once topped the charts with her one and only record, the truck-driver
who shares a name with the manager of his favorite baseball team and
feels a duty to the elderly after wild teenage years – not single
character is without depth. Colonel Sanders and Johnnie Walker even
make appearances, the latter delivering one of the creepiest scenes
I've ever read.
Reading
Murakami can certainly be a mind-bending experience – though it
also feels like a distinctly enriching one as well. We get some
ruminations on history, philosophy, poetry, music, classic Japanese
literature and more. With so much weirdness going on one might easily
get lost in a Murakami novel. Some reviewers have expressed this,
saying things to the effect of 'this is a mess of a plotline' or
something similar. I can sympathize with that in some respect. I
think perhaps if I wasn't so into the story, or if I was otherwise
halted in my reading for some reason I might lose my bearings too.
Though in my two experiences reading Murakami I have gotten hooked
early and flown through them at a good pace. For me it was anything
but a mess, in fact I consider it to be incredibly well crafted. It
is posed more than once in the novel that everything, including the
world is metaphor for something else. I understand that such things
can be a bit too highfalutin for some, but I am not of their number.
I enjoy a good mental puzzle and Murakami is anything but clumsy with
with his layered meanings, otherworldly atmosphere and referencing of
all things academic and cultured.
I
could go on with a further plot summary, but I really don't like
writing those – I also think especially in the case of a writer
like Murakami synopsis' are really only going to fill space in a
review and not communicate much of what makes the book special. I am
tempted to go buy a bunch of Murakami right now and read them in
succession. But I won't do that. As much as I've enjoyed both of the
novels I've read by him I also kind of like the idea of saving those
trips for later. Maybe when I hit a little rough patch of minor or
major disappointments I'll come back to Murakami, and the comfort of
knowing I won't be bored for as long as it takes me to read a third
book by a trusted friend.
For
the song I am compelled to use Kafka on the Shore* -
first written only in lyric form in the novel and later recorded (and
included as part of the audiobook) This blog is called Subliminal
Maybe : this sort of takes the maybe out of question, I know. I could
have racked my brain and come with something interesting I'm sure. It
is an inspiring kind of novel that gets plenty of things turning over
in my head. But for all that this still feels like the right choice,
if anything is in the spirit of the concept of my blog this is it.
Plus how many books actually have a song written 'in them' anyway? I
also noticed after looking for the song, not knowing if it was
recorded anywhere – and finding it, that there is actually a band
called Kafka on the Shore. See what I mean about it being inspiring?